Menelaah Kesiapan Dalam Tutorial Berbasis Webinar: Persepsi, Tantangan, Dan Harapan Mahasiswa

Isi Artikel Utama

Murni Maulina
Refisa Ananda

Abstrak

Dalam konteks pendidikan jarak jauh, kesiapan mahasiswa untuk terlibat dalam tutorial berbasis webinar merupakan faktor penting dalam keberhasilan pembelajaran berbasis praktik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi kesiapan mahasiswa mengikuti tutorial webinar (tuweb) sebagai komponen integral pembelajaran jarak jauh di perguruan tinggi terbuka. Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner online yang diisi oleh 192 siswa yang terdaftar di Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Temuan tersebut mengungkapkan bahwa sebagian besar responden melaporkan pemahaman yang kuat tentang tujuan dan isi mata kuliah Pemantapan Kemampuan Profesional (PKP) dan menyatakan tingkat kesiapan yang tinggi untuk melakukan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Mahasiswa juga menunjukkan kemampuan yang wajar untuk mengatur waktu mereka dan menyelesaikan tugas secara mandiri. Namun, beberapa tantangan yang diantisipasi teridentifikasi, antara lain kesulitan dalam implementasi praktik pengajaran, manajemen waktu, perekaman video instruksional, pemahaman konten, dan penulisan laporan. Oleh karena itu, siswa menyatakan perlunya bimbingan intensif, komunikasi responsif, dukungan emosi, dan akses ke materi pengajaran yang relevan. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi peran penting tutor dan sistem pembelajaran adaptif dalam mendukung keberhasilan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis praktik yang dilakukan melalui platform webinar.

Rincian Artikel

Bagian

Penilitian

Cara Mengutip

Menelaah Kesiapan Dalam Tutorial Berbasis Webinar: Persepsi, Tantangan, Dan Harapan Mahasiswa. (2025). Jurnal TEKNODIK, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.32550/dyt2cs71

Referensi

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Budiastra, A. A. K., Hanafi, H., & Mardiana, A. (2019). Analisis Penyelenggaraan & Layanan Matakuliah Praktek Untuk Daerah 3t. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v20i2.259.2019

Bower, M. (2019). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Emerald Publishing.

Dewatisari, W. F. (2024). The Advantages and Challenges of Face-to-Face vs Webinar Tutorials for Distance Learners at The Open University. International Conference on Innovation in Open and Distance Learning, 424–436. https://conference.ut.ac.id/index.php/innodel-proceedings/article/view/4890/1663

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838761

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12.

Kridasakti, S. W., & Waluya, S. (2020). Problematika Pengelolaan Mata Kuliah Berpraktek dalam Sistem Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Pendidikan Nonformal, 15(2), 52–63. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/JPN/article/download/16421/6394

Martin, F., Sunley, R., & Turner, L. (2017). Student support mechanisms in online learning: A case study of a UK university. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2017(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.397

Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Pearson.

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.

Muflikah, B., Kusuma, V. A., Swidarto, S., & Famularsih, S. (2024). Analyzing Students’ Acceptance Toward the Use of Tutorial Webinar Using Technology Acceptance Model Approach. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i2.560

Mujiono, Marisa, & Prabowo, S. (2022). Students Feedback to Online Learning on Practice Courses. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.33830/ptjj.v23i2.4267.2022

Patel, N. M., Khajuria, A., & Khajuria, A. (2020). Utility of a webinar to educate trainees on UK core surgical training (CST) selection – A cross sectional study and future implications amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.054

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sandra S.A., [None], Andriani, D., Antoro, S. D., Prayekti, [None], & Warsito, [None]. (2011). Teaching and Learning Classroom Action Research at a Distance in an Indonesian Urban Community. Excellence in Higher Education, 2(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.5195/ehe.2011.47

Saputra, A. H., Hartati, H., & Anthony, S. (2021). Pembelajaran Orang Dewasa: Tutorial Webinar (Tuweb) melalui Microsoft Teams Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Terbuka di Era Pandemi. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v5i1.45915

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social-emotional learning: Theory, research, and practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101830

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Sugilar, S. (2020). Effectivity and students’ satisfaction to a tutorial in statistics through a webinar. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012035

Suhandoko, A. D. J. (2022). Optimizing the Development of Prototype Learning Mode of Professional Ability Consolidation (PKP) Courses of the PGSD-UT Study Program in the Archipelago Region. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 4(2), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v4i2.896

Suhartono, & Darmayanti, T. (2015). Pemodelan Pembimbingan Praktik Pemantapan Kemampuan Profesional (PKP) Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Jarak Jauh Melalui Lesson Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 16(1), 10–28.

Swords, C., Bergman, L., Wilson-Jeffers, R., Randall, D., Morris, L. L., Brenner, M. J., & Arora, A. (2021). Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Quality Improvement in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Building a Global Learning Community. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 130(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489420941542

Topping, K. J. (2019). Peer tutoring: Old method, new developments. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 27(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2019.1633486

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including on-line learning. Australian National Training Authority.

Wijayanti, S. W., Ekoresti, S. N., & Rusyana, E. (2022). Persepsi Mahasiswa Universitas Terbuka Bogor Terhadap Tren Tuweb Sebagai Layanan Belajar Daring. Journal of Learning and Technology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33830/jlt.v1i1.3370

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2