Pengukuran Kompetensi Digital Guru Sekolah Dasar
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Teknologi menjadi pendorong, memfasilitasi, dan mempercepat cara hidup manusia. Seiring dengan meningkatnya ketergantungan kehidupan manusia pada teknologi, manusia tidak dapat dipisahkan dari kemajuan teknologi. Teknologi yang berkembang pesat yaitu teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK). TIK yang berkembang sangat cepat yaitu internet dan komunikasi digital. Saat ini belum ada instrumen standar yang tersedia untuk mengetahui indikator keterampian atau kompetensi digital di Indonesia menurut Kerangka Literasi Digital UNESCO. UNESCO memberikan rekomendasi mengenai konstruk yang perlu dipahami dan model atau cara untuk mengukur kompetensi digital. Mengacu pada rekomendasi UNESCO, penelitian ini artikel ini memberiakn gambaran pengembangan instrumen yang dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kompetensi digital guru sekolah dasar di Indonesia. Secara umum, terdapat dua konstruk yang harus dimiliki, yaitu mengumpulkan dan mengelola informasi, serta memproduksi dan membagi informasi. Setiap konstruk memiliki tiga atau empat aspek yang perlu dinilai. Untuk model pengukuran setiap konstruk disarankan untuk dievaluasi melalui tiga instrume, yaitu penilaian kinerja, penilaian berbasis pengetahuan, dan penilaian diri.
The Technology becomes a driver, facilitating and accelerating the way we live. Along with the increasing dependence of human life on technology, humans cannot be separated from technological advancement. The rapidly developing technology is information and communication technology (ICT). The ICT that is developing very quickly is the internet and digital communication. Currently, there are no standard instruments available to know the digital skills indicators according to UNESCO’s Digital Literacy Global Framework. provides recommendations on what constructs need to be understood and the models or ways to measure digital competencies. Referring to UNESCO’s recommendations, this study aims to develop instruments that can be used to measure the competencies of primary school teachers in Indonesia. For the measurement model, it is recommended that each construct be evaluated throught three instruments, namely performance assesment, knowledge-based assesment, and self-assesment
Rincian Artikel
Bagian
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Silakan mendownload dan mengisi Formulir Copyright Transfer dan Formulir Ethical Statement dibawah ini untuk disertakan pada saat pengiriman naskah (Unggah File Tambahan) :
Cara Mengutip
Referensi
Ally, M. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online learner. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 1–18.
Allmann, K., & Blank, G. (2021). Rethinking digital skills in the era of compulsory computing: Methods, measurement, policy and theory. Information, Communication & Society, 24(5), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874475
Alonso-García, S., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2019). Systematic review of good teaching practices with ICT in higher education: Trends and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 4299–4318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09903-5
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens. Publications Office of the European Union.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gervais, J. (2016). The operational definition of competency-based education. Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1011
Hassenzahl, M. (2018). User experience and experience design. In M. Soegaard & R. Dam (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). Interaction Design Foundation.
Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63(1), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113499113
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Iordache, C., Mariën, I., & Baelden, D. (2017). Developing digital skills and competences: A quick-scan analysis of 13 digital literacy models. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1).
Jackman, J. A., Gentile, D. A., Cho, N. J., & Park, Y. (2021). Addressing the digital skills gap for future education. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(5), 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01074-z
Kačinová, V. (2019). From a reductionist to a holistic model of digital competence and media education. Communication Today, 10(2), 16–27.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Van Deursen, A., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2014). Measuring digital skills: From digital skills to tangible outcomes project report.
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Springer.
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Punie, Y., & Carretero Gomez, S. (2022). The Digital Competence Framework 2.2: DigComp 2.2 – The European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Publications Office of the European Union.